Talk:SCAW: Superstars of CAW

ROSTER

Opinion
SCAW SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!! (RESPONSE: Be more elaborare, just saying it sucks is an empty response, if you don't like it, explain why)

Option
SCAW RULES!! FUCK YOU NEXUS.

Opinion
ok.... i shouldnt say it sucks since i basicly dont like shows with caws based on celeberties and famous fictional characters, and danny jackpot. and fuck me?.... i will take critics. im a fan of leagues with ORIGINAL CAWS, and GOOD STORYLINES. i also like shows with some well known caws on it, exept overrated ones.

I just dont like SCAW

DarkAngel
lol aren't you the guy who threatened to kill someone who hadn't heard of SCAW? Kingpatch 16:09, December 20, 2010 (UTC)

The Subcriber Base Part
The sub base claim stays since its a legit claim. Lonestarr was found on the video in question applying for more subs, and around the same time as that comment, his subscriber amount went up by 400. Wally The Masked Admin (Talk) 12:23, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

I don't think I'll get anywhere arguing with an admin, but it really isn't relevant information. Regardless of Sub4Subs or not, it is still one of the most popular CAW leagues around today, the article never claims 2nd most popular, which is what you're trying to dispute. Also, there's no proof Lonestarr did that more than once, and the rule is innocent until proven guilty. Burden of proof that more than 400 or so of his subscribers are bots is on you. SSJ5Gogetenks 05:24, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

It is relevant. Regardless if its only one time, it throws doubt over any claim of popularity. It doesn't matter if Lonestarr did it once or a thousand times, it taints any claim of the amount of subscribers and makes the promotion look bush league. Wally The Masked Admin (Talk) 09:25, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

The only claim of popularity in the article is it being "one of the most popular CAW Leagues on Youtube today." What if I remove it from the article. Would that allow the subscriber section to be removed? SSJ5Gogetenks 11:06, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Gogetenks. Everything in a company's history or a person's life on the real Wikipedia is documented, whether its positive or negative. Such should be the case here. Lonestarr made the choice to get subscribers the cheap way, and it comes with consequences. Its gonna stay regardless of whether or not the page says SCAW is popular. Don't blame us, blame Lonestarr for making that mistake. ~ Amez